The very first is that our God is a God who salvages. Joe Boyd told me last year that Wall-E was the most spiritual movie made in 2008, and I couldn't agree more.
Look, we Christians have created all kinds of baggage around the word "saved." It's not really meaningful to us. Does the word mean remotely the same thing when saying "I got saved this weekend" and "I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance?" Obviously not. Forget the comparison of spiritual life and car insurance... aside from that, the word is still being used in totally different ways. Try this on for size, though:
Salvage: to rescue or save especially from wreckage or ruin
Catch that? Synonym for "save" is "salvage" when referring to "rescuing from wreckage or ruin." That's a pretty good explanation of what it means to enter a relationship with God... what if instead of saying "I'm saved" we instead said "I'm salvaged?" I don't know if our egos could handle it ("I don't need salvaging!") but it would be a lot more theologically accurate.
But WAIT! There's MORE!
I'm not going to spend a ton of time defending this (it's a blog post, and it's already too long) unless somebody objects, in which case I'll dive in and tackle it more thoroughly. But here it is:
God's goal is to save the world. I don't mean that just in the soteriological sense, but also in the practical. God's desire is BOTH to offer salvation (saving relationship, eternal life, etc) to every individual, AND to salvage our relationships, our culture, our work, our institutions, and our planet. These things are broken, usually as a result of our own brokenness. God is a fixer by nature, and each broken thing he desires to fix. I'm positing that half on Scripture and half by extrapolating from his character. If you have a great verse I should know please stick it in the comments.
But that's a quick writeup on one of my most basic understandings about life, God, and theology. It's not one that everyone shares (at the very least, it's fair to say that every 5-pointer has already written me off as a heretic) but this is the absolute bedrock of my understanding of God.
Fundamental Assumption #1: God is a Salvager by both nature and choice. It's a fundamental character trait to fix what is broken, which means that His goal is not only to redeem individuals from their brokenness but also to redeem the world: both nature's beauty and human society are fit recipients of his attention.
Or, more simply:
Our God is a God who salvages.
Absolutely. I like to use the story of the Gadarene demoniac as an example. Jesus "saved" him on every level: spiritually, physically, emotionally, relationally, thus illustrating your point and the all-encompassing nature of the Kingdom of God. Thanks for this.
ReplyDeleteThis was an excellent post!!!
ReplyDeleteLove the comment on the "5-pointer"! No, I do not think you're a heretic.
ReplyDeleteThis makes me think: is God reactive, or proactive? Example: Christ's work on the cross. When thinking of God this way, I tend not to think of "making all things new," rather I think of "responding to what's broken"—which makes me think of Open Theism.
Just a thought, for what it's worth.
What I appreciate about your suggestion of 'salvage' is that it incorporates a fundamental component of biblical salvation that is either ambiguous or altogether lacking in the word 'save(d)' and that is restoration. However, I'm wondering if the implication of the component might be the point of resistance for some people today, simply because it requires that the old be changed into something new--i.e. the old life has to go. But again, that concept is absolutely central to the biblical view of salvation--at least it is for Paul. I say keep running with this, Micah; it sounds really good so far.
ReplyDelete